A company uses a machine to produce chocolate bars. The machine is designed to produce chocolate bars with average fat content of \(30\)g. After using the machine for many years, the manager wishes to test, at \(5\%\) level of significance, if the machine still maintains the average fat content in the chocolate bars at \(30\)g. He selects a sample of \(40\) chocolate bars for testing.
After some years of usage, the machine broke down. While waiting for the new machine to arrive, the company reverted to their traditional mode of producing handmade chocolate bars. The manager suspects that handmade chocolate bars have higher average fat content than those made by the machines. To verify his suspicion, the manager asked his staff to perform a hypothesis test at \(5\%\) significance level, on a random sample of \(40\) handmade chocolate bars.
The fat content, \(x\) grams, of the \(40\) handmade chocolate bars are summarised as follows:
\({\sum x = 1220,} \qquad \sum(x - 30.5)^2 = 50\)
The manager now knows the population variance of the fat content in handmade chocolate bars. It is given that the population variance is smaller than the unbiased estimate of the population variance calculated in part (ii). Without carrying out another hypothesis test, explain with justification, if there will be a change in the manager’s conclusion about his suspicion at \(5\%\) significance level.
[1]Video solution locked
A free account saves your progress; this video needs tuition enrolment.
680+ questions here come with free worked solutions. A free account saves your questions and progress; this one needs tuition enrolment.
Create a free account to practise similar questions.
Need help? Join our JC Math tuition classes.
Learn more